ITTN

International Telecommunications Transmission Network
 
HomeHome  PortalPortal  CalendarCalendar  FAQFAQ  SearchSearch  MemberlistMemberlist  UsergroupsUsergroups  RegisterRegister  Log inLog in  

Share | 
 

 GPEO Territorial Sanctions

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
AuthorMessage
spartacus8193



Posts : 56
Join date : 2009-10-07

PostSubject: GPEO Territorial Sanctions   Sun Nov 01, 2009 6:15 pm

Alliance of Wild Card and the United Middle Eastern Forces

Petition for United Community of A Global Society and Global Pioneering Elite Organization Withdrawal

We the free factions of Wild Card, Free Republic of United Arab States, and United Middle Eastern Forces hereby declare that UCGS and GPEO must withdraw from portion of their territory in order to restore the perpetual peace and tensionless diplomacy. The Communist and expansionist views within the leadership of GPEO and UCGS led to over half the world being prohibited from the possible improvements from the tactical to the practical everyday uses of what makes war. The UCGS engulfs the world so that no Virtual Military can grow outside a small portion of land without crossing UCGS borders.

When I becomes necessary for new Virtual Militaries to expand beyond their original borders into lands of interest, UCGS prohibits much of the land of interest form being captured, and insures that GPEO will remain the Virtual World’s dominant power. This resembles the former Soviet Union in every way, and GPEO leadership said it themselves that GPEO is communist, and Communism will not stand in the Virtual World.

This Alliance proposes territorial sanctions against GPEO and UCGS. We want them out of the following territories:
China
Pakistan
Afghanistan
Western Iraq (will be described in full upon request)
Syria
Egypt
Istanbul
Italy
Greece
Mid West/ Western US
Great Britain
Northern Ireland.

This is not to reduce GPEO’s military power, but to add more diversity to the VR World. This adds the option for other territories for more VM‘s. This it to provide the GPEO with concentrated forces than being spread out over the entire globe.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
GPEO
Guest



PostSubject: Re: GPEO Territorial Sanctions   Tue Nov 03, 2009 5:16 am

We understand that factions aim to expand, though the UCGS is a Free Society are are not ruled by oppression. Those who want to be free will not support any faction that rules be force or uses a regulation system or media to control its civilians. How ever, some of the regions on that list may be evacuated if the civilians wish due to the low population; though also many on that list will only made avalible to factions that are of that region and will not be declared non UCGS until someone of that area starts up a faction. A list of UCGS Regions that can and or wont be able to be declared UCGS.

List to be un clasifide as UCGS due to recently freed from rule or where citizens can leave if they feel that heving a ruler is too oppressing:
Pakistan
Afghanistan
Syria
West Iraq


List of regions only to be donated to the leadership of leaders of the areas or factions playing the role of that nation (lead by one with a good knowledge of the coulture and history of the areas; so they are lead as it would be for the area/region):
China
Great Britain
Northern Ireland
Egypt
Italy
Greece

The Great Planes of Middle States of America can be set as avalible to sevreal factions or single state or some states can be made to be connected for factions that wish to be stationed in the States.

The UCGS and GPEO are not Communist, they are mainly Resource Based and Semi-Anarchist, where no one person makes decisions, a logic system is in place for making national decisions for the area and problems are arrived at and delt with in scientific and logical manner, where if a mistake occures it can be corrected and not repeted again.

"Communism will not stand in the Virtual World."

The only offical Communist group in this VR-World was Uatia, and they are no longer part of this VR-World, unless they choose to be. And if someone started a Communist faction then it should not be looked down upon, only those who knows about it and all who have lived in a good and legit Communist system will speak positivly about it.
Back to top Go down
FSX Capital Guardians

avatar

Posts : 149
Join date : 2009-10-20
Location : Washington DC

PostSubject: Re: GPEO Territorial Sanctions   Tue Nov 03, 2009 6:44 am

GPEO wrote:

The Great Planes of Middle States of America can be set as avalible to sevreal factions or single state or some states can be made to be connected for factions that wish to be stationed in the States.
If this is the case, how come we arn't able to attain West Virginia?
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://www.fsxcg.webs.com
ITTN-News Network



Posts : 18
Join date : 2009-10-07
Location : Newsroom, Washington D.C.

PostSubject: ???WTF?   Tue Nov 03, 2009 2:53 pm

Ok, im comfused what exacty is UCGS? Why does it exist, what is its purpose? All UCGS is going right now is blocking the expansion of; FSXCG, VMC, UMEF, UCOFS, WFC, VNF, and even GPEO. UCGS isn't even a VM! so logicaly they can't even control the territory. In times of war, dosen't the UCFS territory then belong to GPEO? Dosen't that mean that that vland is GPEO land. I thought the whole point of the virtual world system was to have a fun and enjoyable aming experience while simulating virtual military combat? The UCGS territory limits every VM's ability to move and simulate combat with another vm. The UCGS is an illegal VM because:
-1. it was founded by GPEO, another VM to limit the movement of all othe vm's
-2. It has no military so it cannot defend itself
-3. No REAL country would completely disarm themselves
-4. It cannot be considered a VM because it has no military so logcaly it cannot own any land
UCGS can better be called a Civil Community, under the protection of GPEO, but GPEO has to control the land that UCGS is in.

I know this sounds angry but I REALLY don't see the need for UCFS.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
spartacus8193



Posts : 56
Join date : 2009-10-07

PostSubject: Re: GPEO Territorial Sanctions   Tue Nov 03, 2009 2:56 pm

UCGS is "A Demiliterized Global Resource Based Community Protected by Freedom Fighting Factions and Defense Factions. Factions that are not for the protection of this Free Society are not permitted to pass through unless they are unarmed and escorted by the factions protecting it's Freedom. The Regions that are of the UCGS are not under the control of a faction, it's population rejects to be controlled by any faction. Factions that are permitted to base in these regions are not permitted to control or use the citizens to build up its force, a rebellion will happen and a GPEO type force will liberate the free socierty."


Edit- Dragnoxz, I know you are GPEO, and you said ti YOURSLEF in a voice skype session that GPEO was communist!

Only those who have lived under a Communist rule would talk good about it? PLEASE tell me one person IN THIS WORLD who can possitively say they lived under a legit Lenin-Marxist Communist state and ENJOYED living there, because last time I checked, unless they were government official in said Communist state, they were lower than US's bottom classes.


As for Western Iraq, The border will be drawn at the Euphrates River. UMEF will commence light troop movemtns into the area. Baghdad will remain GPEO territory, however, Basra will be UMEF territory. Official taking of the territory will commence ca. 1800 Hours, Eastern Standard Time.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
FSX Capital Guardians

avatar

Posts : 149
Join date : 2009-10-20
Location : Washington DC

PostSubject: Re: GPEO Territorial Sanctions   Tue Nov 03, 2009 3:45 pm

spartacus8193 wrote:

Only those who have lived under a Communist rule would talk good about it? PLEASE tell me one person IN THIS WORLD who can possitively say they lived under a legit Lenin-Marxist Communist state and ENJOYED living there, because last time I checked, unless they were government official in said Communist state, they were lower than US's bottom classes.
the pigs in animal farm lol!
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://www.fsxcg.webs.com
cappilot12



Posts : 75
Join date : 2009-10-11

PostSubject: Re: GPEO Territorial Sanctions   Tue Nov 03, 2009 3:54 pm

How can GPEO suddenly be against communism when for over a year one of your allies was a communist state? Personally I am for UCGS being broken up. It is delaying the construction of new virtual militaries and we have VRC to monitor human rights. Simultaneously if these countries are needed to prevent dictatorship then why aren't all nations part of UCGS? To be honest UCGS is seeming more and more like a defense strategy than a protection and demilitarization organization. This is one of many things that could potentially be discussed at a summit.
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://www.youtube.com/cappilot12
spartacus8193



Posts : 56
Join date : 2009-10-07

PostSubject: Re: GPEO Territorial Sanctions   Tue Nov 03, 2009 3:55 pm

FSX Capital Guardians wrote:
spartacus8193 wrote:

Only those who have lived under a Communist rule would talk good about it? PLEASE tell me one person IN THIS WORLD who can possitively say they lived under a legit Lenin-Marxist Communist state and ENJOYED living there, because last time I checked, unless they were government official in said Communist state, they were lower than US's bottom classes.
the pigs in animal farm lol!


Good point... even though they are PIGS and Animals Razz
Back to top Go down
View user profile
FSX Capital Guardians

avatar

Posts : 149
Join date : 2009-10-20
Location : Washington DC

PostSubject: Re: GPEO Territorial Sanctions   Tue Nov 03, 2009 3:59 pm

cappilot12 wrote:
This is one of many things that could potentially be discussed at a summit.

ill pack my bags.

oh and I am also in favor of a breakup/contraction of the UCGS
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://www.fsxcg.webs.com
cappilot12



Posts : 75
Join date : 2009-10-11

PostSubject: Re: GPEO Territorial Sanctions   Tue Nov 03, 2009 4:07 pm

Capital Guardians, have you considered getting Skype? It would make a lot of communication easier and faster.
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://www.youtube.com/cappilot12
FSX Capital Guardians

avatar

Posts : 149
Join date : 2009-10-20
Location : Washington DC

PostSubject: Re: GPEO Territorial Sanctions   Tue Nov 03, 2009 4:08 pm

cappilot12 wrote:
Capital Guardians, have you considered getting Skype? It would make a lot of communication easier and faster.

thats MR capital guardians to you Wink

used to have it... i prefer teamspeak for some reason.

and please, call me fury. its my call sign on the team.
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://www.fsxcg.webs.com
cappilot12



Posts : 75
Join date : 2009-10-11

PostSubject: Re: GPEO Territorial Sanctions   Tue Nov 03, 2009 4:13 pm

Okay Fury, for VM-VM or VM-ITTN or VM-VRC or whatever it is at the moment you need though, Skype is normally more appropriate for file sharing and instant messaging.
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://www.youtube.com/cappilot12
FSX Capital Guardians

avatar

Posts : 149
Join date : 2009-10-20
Location : Washington DC

PostSubject: Re: GPEO Territorial Sanctions   Tue Nov 03, 2009 4:14 pm

cappilot12 wrote:
Okay Fury, for VM-VM or VM-ITTN or VM-VRC or whatever it is at the moment you need though, Skype is normally more appropriate for file sharing and instant messaging.
ok thanks. ill check it out.
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://www.fsxcg.webs.com
spartacus8193



Posts : 56
Join date : 2009-10-07

PostSubject: Re: GPEO Territorial Sanctions   Tue Nov 03, 2009 4:16 pm

Skype really is a nessesity for a VM leader. Most other VMs are on it.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
cappilot12



Posts : 75
Join date : 2009-10-11

PostSubject: Re: GPEO Territorial Sanctions   Tue Nov 03, 2009 4:46 pm

Thanks Fury, we'd like to work out the details with you on Skype.
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://www.youtube.com/cappilot12
FSX Capital Guardians

avatar

Posts : 149
Join date : 2009-10-20
Location : Washington DC

PostSubject: Re: GPEO Territorial Sanctions   Thu Nov 12, 2009 5:37 pm

spartacus8193 wrote:
FSX Capital Guardians wrote:
spartacus8193 wrote:

Only those who have lived under a Communist rule would talk good about it? PLEASE tell me one person IN THIS WORLD who can possitively say they lived under a legit Lenin-Marxist Communist state and ENJOYED living there, because last time I checked, unless they were government official in said Communist state, they were lower than US's bottom classes.
the pigs in animal farm lol!


Good point... even though they are PIGS and Animals Razz

this just sorta popped into my mind randomly...

but anyway, one problem is that EVERYONE works for the government in a communist state. the government owns EVERYTHING remember? lol!
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://www.fsxcg.webs.com
Dragnoxz'
Admin
avatar

Chinese zodiac : Dragon
Posts : 734
Join date : 2009-10-04
Age : 29
Location : Top Secret

PostSubject: Re: GPEO Territorial Sanctions   Fri Nov 13, 2009 8:13 am

FSX Capital Guardians wrote:
spartacus8193 wrote:
FSX Capital Guardians wrote:
spartacus8193 wrote:

Only those who have lived under a Communist rule would talk good about it? PLEASE tell me one person IN THIS WORLD who can possitively say they lived under a legit Lenin-Marxist Communist state and ENJOYED living there, because last time I checked, unless they were government official in said Communist state, they were lower than US's bottom classes.
the pigs in animal farm lol!


Good point... even though they are PIGS and Animals Razz

this just sorta popped into my mind randomly...

but anyway, one problem is that EVERYONE works for the government in a communist state. the government owns EVERYTHING remember? lol!

Yea, in the case for UCGS, there is not Government owning everything, community decisions are made by calcuations on computers. It is like how the US Military uses computers to make decisions for combat operations, but this computer system is not made to attack or kill, it is made to help humanity and the community, to make the best decisions to preserve life, to be able to feed and shelter everyone in the community, to predict an estimation in growth, to maintain crops, and to help automate things like fast food, to manufacture things in factories st a fat pase, trasportation, railways, product distribution, etc. The best thing is everyone in the community is not a wage slave, they tend to their family, learn what they want so they can become what they want to be, families spend more time together rather than being seperated by jobs, traveling is a boming activity, construction managing using automated equipment, medical research, technology research and archetecture jobs are on the rise, medical tech is very advanced, production is needing to be slwon down due to over production of manufactured goods. Picture there being enough resources, electronics, cars, aircraft, schools, universities, places of worship, food of all kinds, etc. There is no such thing as theft because no one has a reason to steal, unless they want to, even then no one would care because everythnig anyone would ever want is avalible at distribitors all over, sort of like a store where you can walk in and grab what ever you can carry or might need and walk out with out someone putting you in jail for stealing, and there is no neeed for a jail, those who may act to harm another or someone that may seem like a criminal would be taken to a place where they would get mental help, therapy, or other kind of assistance for their behavier. There is no monetary system, few jobs and jobs that are avalible like maintaining and monitering equipment, research, etc are not long to do, one working may find their job to only be for an hour maybe, then another person would take over in shifts. those working work because they choose to knowing they are helping the community. Also, 'Faith' is a number one thing that many just don't give up, so in the UCGS freedom of religon and places of worship are avalible for all religons, and no one has to pay to worship. It is absolut freedom. For a government to come in to rule them using a monetary system would severly decrease their freedom. This is why a faction 'Defense Force' is only allowed in to operate with in the UCGS regions, a defense force dosn't aim to control the population, it is mostly there to defend the airspace. The GPEO is the UCGS's main Defense Organizations, ASPL use to be but they united within the GPEO.
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://ittn.forumotion.com
Sponsored content




PostSubject: Re: GPEO Territorial Sanctions   

Back to top Go down
 
GPEO Territorial Sanctions
View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 1 of 1

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
ITTN :: FSX Virtual World System :: Virtual Military Factions-
Jump to: