ITTN

International Telecommunications Transmission Network
 
HomeHome  PortalPortal  CalendarCalendar  FAQFAQ  SearchSearch  MemberlistMemberlist  UsergroupsUsergroups  RegisterRegister  Log inLog in  

Share | 
 

 Northeastern Seaboard

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
AuthorMessage
FSX Capital Guardians

avatar

Posts : 149
Join date : 2009-10-20
Location : Washington DC

PostSubject: Northeastern Seaboard   Tue Oct 20, 2009 5:49 pm

To the CO of the GPEO

Greetings sir
I represent the Capital Guardians, a new VM in the VR world. We operate out of Andrews AFB/NAF, and are interested in negotiating territorial agreements. Currently we hold Northern VA, Maryland, and the District of Columbia. Please contact me via PM for negotiations. I hope we can reach a bipartisan agreement.
*NOTE WE WERE INFORMED THAT THE TERRITORY IN QUESTION IS JOINLY OWNED BY THE GPEO AND THE NAF, THEREFORE THIS MESSAGE HAS BEEN SENT TO BOTH OF YOU
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://www.fsxcg.webs.com
Killer



Posts : 25
Join date : 2009-10-20

PostSubject: Re: Northeastern Seaboard   Tue Oct 20, 2009 7:28 pm

Greetings, i'm happy to see another VM rising in the world. I hope we can too come to an agreement here. Virginia current is held by us and is very important to us. You are welcome to occupy West Virginia but since it is protected by us under the UCGS, we cannot just lease it away. We need to know more about your VM. How it works, what kind of government you use, and your policies. We cannot just let anyone occupy UCGS territory because we might get a corrupt VM into there and that wouldn't be good. Maryland and D.C are not controlled by us but controlledVNF, so you would have to run that by them
Back to top Go down
View user profile
FSX Capital Guardians

avatar

Posts : 149
Join date : 2009-10-20
Location : Washington DC

PostSubject: Re: Northeastern Seaboard   Wed Oct 21, 2009 1:09 pm

Thank you for your quick reply sir,

a brief look at our foreign policy:

1.) we currently operate out of Andrews AFB/NAF, and have no plans for expansion from there.
2.) We have a High Command, containing four people, including myself, who make general decisions for the entire VM. They recieve input from hand selected, volunteer committees (Committees contain 3 people. One high command, and two enlisted. this can change as we begin to grow.)
3.) our purpose for West Virginia is for UNARMED flight training, mainly low alt flying in rugged terrain. We would never land there, only being in the airspace for an hour or two while we run airborne exercises, and RTB. Exercises would be simulated ground offenses in low population areas, Winchester. weapons would be simulated by the AWACS/FAC present in the airspace. note our aircraft would NEVER land in West Virginia, nor would they EVER carry live weapons into the airspace, unless under direct threat from another VM.

As for Norfolk, which i assume is vital, we are willing, after we learn about your vm of course, to provide CAP (Close Air Support), HAVCAP, and sweeps of the airspace, mainly providing top cover.

we hope we can reach a quick, and fair agreement.
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://www.fsxcg.webs.com
Sponsored content




PostSubject: Re: Northeastern Seaboard   

Back to top Go down
 
Northeastern Seaboard
View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 1 of 1

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
ITTN :: International Structured Factions :: 02 Global Pioneers Elite Organization (Intel)-
Jump to: